GST and Foreign Affiliate Services: Recent Delhi High Court Ruling Explained
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
In an important recent ruling, the Delhi High Court clarified the valuation rules under GST for services provided by foreign affiliates to their related domestic entities. The court's decision in Metal One Corporation India (P.) Ltd v. Union of India reaffirms that in cases where no invoice is issued for services provided by a foreign affiliate, the value of such services should be deemed as Nil. This interpretation provides relief to many companies facing tax liabilities due to seconded employees and similar cross-border service arrangements.
This article dives into the key aspects of the case, the legal interpretations, and what this ruling means for businesses and GST compliance.
Key Highlights of the Ruling
Background of the Case
The case involved multiple writ petitions challenging Show Cause Notices (SCNs) issued to Indian entities that had received services from their foreign affiliates. These services involved the secondment of employees (a temporary transfer of employees) from a foreign parent company to assist the Indian entity. The tax authorities argued that these arrangements were subject to GST, even if no invoices were raised.Issue of GST Liability on Seconded Employees
The primary issue was whether the Indian entities were liable for GST on services deemed to be imported when employees were temporarily transferred from foreign affiliates. The companies argued that these transactions should not incur additional tax burdens under GST.Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) Circular No. 210/4/2024-GST
This CBIC Circular clarified that if the recipient domestic entity is eligible for full Input Tax Credit (ITC), and if no invoice is raised by the foreign affiliate, the value of services would be deemed as Nil for GST purposes. This Circular was critical in shaping the court’s judgment.
Detailed Breakdown of the Court’s Decision
1. Interpretation of Rule 28 of the CGST Rules
The Delhi High Court relied heavily on Rule 28 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, which governs transactions between related or distinct persons. According to Rule 28:
- Second Proviso to Rule 28: If the recipient of services is eligible for full ITC, the value declared in the invoice shall be deemed to be the open market value.
- Implication of Non-Invoicing: The CBIC Circular further clarified that if no invoice is raised for these services, the value is deemed as Nil. Thus, for tax purposes, these services are considered to have zero value.
2. Applicability of CBIC Circular to Foreign Affiliates and Domestic Entities
The ruling emphasized that the CBIC Circular’s clarification holds in this scenario, as the recipient (the Indian entity) was eligible for full ITC. The absence of an invoice leads to the service value being considered as Nil. Consequently, no tax liability arises from these transactions, as confirmed by the court.
3. Impact on Show Cause Notices Issued to the Petitioners
The court invalidated the SCNs issued to the petitioners, as they were based on the assumption that taxes were due on these secondment services. Since the value of services was deemed Nil, the basis for GST liability was effectively nullified.
Legal Precedents Cited
The court referenced the Supreme Court ruling in CCE & Service Tax v. Northern Operating Systems (P) Ltd. (2022), which had set a precedent that foreign affiliates’ seconded employees could constitute “manpower supply” services. However, the Delhi High Court concluded that this precedent did not apply here due to the clarification issued by the CBIC and the specific provisions of Rule 28.
Implications for Businesses
No GST Liability if No Invoice Raised
The judgment clarifies that if a foreign affiliate provides services to a related domestic entity eligible for full ITC and no invoice is raised, the service value is deemed as Nil. This interpretation significantly reduces GST liability risks for companies in similar situations.Precedent for Other Cases Involving Foreign Affiliates
This ruling sets an important precedent for companies with foreign affiliates that second employees or provide services to India. The value of such services, if un-invoiced, may be considered Nil for GST purposes, provided the recipient is eligible for full ITC.Broader Impact on Cross-Border Employment Arrangements
The judgment helps clarify how cross-border employee transfers or secondments are treated under GST. Companies engaged in similar arrangements can rely on this ruling to structure their transactions and avoid unintended GST liabilities.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Comments
Post a Comment